Harawayan Cyborg Manifesto on Youth AprIGF 2019 Vladivostok — Cyborg and boundary crossing

This essay applies the conceptual framework of the Feminist STS — most prominently associated with Donna Haraway — to re-read the Youth AprIGF 2019 Vladivostok conference. Target audience: researchers, doctoral students, policy analysts, and executives.

Introduction: The Problem

Haraway's Cyborg Manifesto offered the political possibility of disrupting binaries — human/machine, nature/culture, male/female. Youth AprIGF is a venue where these boundaries are constantly negotiated.

This essay argues that the multistakeholder process of Youth AprIGF becomes intelligible in its specificity only through the concept of Cyborg and boundary crossing, and that the concept itself undergoes transformation under the new material of digital space. Describing this mutual transformation is the task of this essay.

Politics of the human/machine boundary

Discussion of アジア太平洋若者 in Russia is politics of the human/machine boundary. Haraway's "situated knowledges" suggests that IGF produces situated knowledge even while speaking the universal.

Each session's agenda-setting can be read as a contemporary restaging of the Donna Haraway-type problematic.

The Youth IGF practically raises the philosophical problematic of intergenerational justice.

Situated knowledges

Donna Haraway's concepts are not confined to abstract philosophical discussion; they apply to the concrete agenda items debated at the 2019 conference. We examine that application below.

1. Application to "アジア太平洋若者"

Discussion of "アジア太平洋若者" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a central problematic. In Russia's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around アジア太平洋若者 are particularly at stake.

2. Application to "フェローシップ"

Discussion of "フェローシップ" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a derivative problematic. In Russia's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around フェローシップ are particularly at stake.

3. Application to "メンタルヘルス"

Discussion of "メンタルヘルス" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Russia's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around メンタルヘルス are particularly at stake.

4. Application to "若者育成"

Discussion of "若者育成" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Russia's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 若者育成 are particularly at stake.

5. Application to "若者のSNS利用"

Discussion of "若者のSNS利用" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Russia's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 若者のSNS利用 are particularly at stake.

Implications for Executives and Practitioners

The philosophical reflection of this essay is not merely academic. The Donna Haraway perspective carries three practical implications for executives operating in Russia.

First, it raises the reflexive question of how the firm's business model connects to the logic of Cyborg and boundary crossing. Second, in dialogue with regulators and civil society, it suggests dimensions of consensus formation that purely technical arguments cannot reach. Third, it indicates that the long-term ground of business legitimacy lies not so much in technical advantage or market share as in participation in such philosophical-normative debates.

Academic Positioning and Future Research

The argument of this essay attempts to graft a philosophical perspective onto the mainstream political-science and legal approaches to internet governance research. Three future research questions follow.

1. Verification of the applicability of Donna Haraway's framework to other IGF conferences
2. Comparative contrast between Feminist STS and other theoretical traditions
3. Exploration of dialogue possibilities with the indigenous intellectual traditions of Russia

In particular, the third point has the potential to liberate IGF research from West-centric debate and open a more multi-layered discursive space.

---

Primary Sources

• IGF Secretariat. Annual Reports of Youth AprIGF.
• Youth AprIGF 2019 Vladivostok Conference Materials.
• Nakazawa Yuki Blog. https://nkzw.jp/category/igf/

Secondary Sources (Philosophy)

• Works of Donna Haraway (representative texts of Feminist STS)

---

*This piece belongs to the academic essays (philosophy series). The author's views do not necessarily represent those of any institutional affiliation. Feedback and critique are welcome.*

更新履歴

第1稿投稿 2026年9月30日 8時55分（記事コンテンツアップ）

— 中澤祐樹