Buen Vivir on Global IGF 2025 Oslo — Sumak Kawsay / Suma Qamaña

This essay applies the conceptual framework of the Latin American Indigenous Philosophy — most prominently associated with Alberto Acosta / Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions — to re-read the Global IGF 2025 Oslo conference. Target audience: researchers, doctoral students, policy analysts, and executives.

Introduction: The Problem

Buen Vivir, rooted in Latin American indigenous thought and inscribed in Bolivian-Ecuadorian constitutions, names a concept of "good living." Debates on IGFのこれから at Global IGF can be reinterrogated from this lens.

This essay argues that the multistakeholder process of Global IGF becomes intelligible in its specificity only through the concept of Sumak Kawsay / Suma Qamaña, and that the concept itself undergoes transformation under the new material of digital space. Describing this mutual transformation is the task of this essay.

Alternative to developmentalism

Against Norway's development model, Buen Vivir centers harmony with community and nature rather than "more and faster" development. Digital infrastructure investment can be reviewed from this lens.

The conference theme "Building Digital Governance Together" carries implications beyond a mere policy slogan. It can be positioned as a contemporary reformulation, in digital-era vocabulary, of the kinds of questions Alberto Acosta / Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions problematized.

The form of the Global IGF stands between the principle of national sovereignty and the logic of a global public realm that transcends it.

Digital good living

Alberto Acosta / Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions's concepts are not confined to abstract philosophical discussion; they apply to the concrete agenda items debated at the 2025 conference. We examine that application below.

1. Application to "IGFのこれから"

Discussion of "IGFのこれから" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alberto Acosta / Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions's Sumak Kawsay / Suma Qamaña, as a central problematic. In Norway's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around IGFのこれから are particularly at stake.

2. Application to "海底ケーブル"

Discussion of "海底ケーブル" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alberto Acosta / Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions's Sumak Kawsay / Suma Qamaña, as a derivative problematic. In Norway's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 海底ケーブル are particularly at stake.

3. Application to "情報の完全性"

Discussion of "情報の完全性" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alberto Acosta / Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions's Sumak Kawsay / Suma Qamaña, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Norway's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 情報の完全性 are particularly at stake.

4. Application to "デジタル格差"

Discussion of "デジタル格差" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alberto Acosta / Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions's Sumak Kawsay / Suma Qamaña, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Norway's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around デジタル格差 are particularly at stake.

5. Application to "若者"

Discussion of "若者" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alberto Acosta / Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions's Sumak Kawsay / Suma Qamaña, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Norway's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 若者 are particularly at stake.

Implications for Executives and Practitioners

The philosophical reflection of this essay is not merely academic. The Alberto Acosta / Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions perspective carries three practical implications for executives operating in Norway.

First, it raises the reflexive question of how the firm's business model connects to the logic of Sumak Kawsay / Suma Qamaña. Second, in dialogue with regulators and civil society, it suggests dimensions of consensus formation that purely technical arguments cannot reach. Third, it indicates that the long-term ground of business legitimacy lies not so much in technical advantage or market share as in participation in such philosophical-normative debates.

Academic Positioning and Future Research

The argument of this essay attempts to graft a philosophical perspective onto the mainstream political-science and legal approaches to internet governance research. Three future research questions follow.

1. Verification of the applicability of Alberto Acosta / Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions's framework to other IGF conferences
2. Comparative contrast between Latin American Indigenous Philosophy and other theoretical traditions
3. Exploration of dialogue possibilities with the indigenous intellectual traditions of Norway

In particular, the third point has the potential to liberate IGF research from West-centric debate and open a more multi-layered discursive space.

---

Primary Sources

• IGF Secretariat. Annual Reports of Global IGF.
• Global IGF 2025 Oslo Conference Materials.
• Nakazawa Yuki Blog. https://nkzw.jp/category/igf/

Secondary Sources (Philosophy)

• Works of Alberto Acosta / Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions (representative texts of Latin American Indigenous Philosophy)

---

*This piece belongs to the academic essays (philosophy series). The author's views do not necessarily represent those of any institutional affiliation. Feedback and critique are welcome.*

更新履歴

第1稿投稿 2026年10月7日 18時53分（記事コンテンツアップ）

— 中澤祐樹