{"id":10571,"date":"2023-08-29T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-08-28T23:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nkzw.jp\/igf\/2023\/08\/29\/en-philo-aprigf-2023-brisbane-heidegger-technology\/"},"modified":"2023-08-29T08:00:00","modified_gmt":"2023-08-28T23:00:00","slug":"en-philo-aprigf-2023-brisbane-heidegger-technology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nkzw.jp\/igf\/2023\/08\/29\/en-philo-aprigf-2023-brisbane-heidegger-technology\/","title":{"rendered":"Heideggerian Technology on AprIGF 2023 Brisbane \u2014 Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Thumbnail\"<\/p>\n

\n

This essay applies the conceptual framework of the Ontology \/ Phenomenology<\/strong> \u2014 most prominently associated with Martin Heidegger<\/strong> \u2014 to re-read the AprIGF 2023 Brisbane conference. Target audience: researchers, doctoral students, policy analysts, and executives.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Introduction: The Problem<\/h2>\n

Heidegger's concept of Ge-stell (enframing) in "The Question Concerning Technology" captures how modern technology reveals the world as "standing-reserve." The themes of AprIGF 2023 directly engage the question of controlling this enframing.<\/p>\n

This essay argues that the multistakeholder process of AprIGF becomes intelligible in its specificity only through the concept of Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve<\/strong>, and that the concept itself undergoes transformation under the new material of digital space. Describing this mutual transformation is the task of this essay.<\/p>\n

\"Analytical<\/p>\n

The internet as enframing<\/h2>\n

Topics like AI\u898f\u5236 risk treating both humans and nature as data standing-reserve. Read Heideggerianly, whether the traditional modes of world-disclosure in Australia contain a "saving power" that can counter this enframing becomes the central question.<\/p>\n

Each session's agenda-setting can be read as a contemporary restaging of the Martin Heidegger-type problematic.<\/p>\n

The regional IGF (AprIGF) holds a philosophically distinct position as the intermediate category mediating global universality and national particularity.<\/p>\n

The saving power<\/h2>\n

Martin Heidegger's concepts are not confined to abstract philosophical discussion; they apply to the concrete agenda items debated at the 2023 conference. We examine that application below.<\/p>\n

1. Application to "AI\u898f\u5236"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "AI\u898f\u5236" can be positioned, from the perspective of Martin Heidegger's Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve<\/strong>, as a central problematic. In Australia's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around AI\u898f\u5236 are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

2. Application to "\u30c7\u30a3\u30b9\u30a4\u30f3\u30d5\u30a9\u30e1\u30fc\u30b7\u30e7\u30f3"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "\u30c7\u30a3\u30b9\u30a4\u30f3\u30d5\u30a9\u30e1\u30fc\u30b7\u30e7\u30f3" can be positioned, from the perspective of Martin Heidegger's Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve<\/strong>, as a derivative problematic. In Australia's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around \u30c7\u30a3\u30b9\u30a4\u30f3\u30d5\u30a9\u30e1\u30fc\u30b7\u30e7\u30f3 are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

3. Application to "\u63a5\u7d9a\u6027"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "\u63a5\u7d9a\u6027" can be positioned, from the perspective of Martin Heidegger's Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve<\/strong>, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Australia's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around \u63a5\u7d9a\u6027 are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

4. Application to "\u5730\u57df\u5354\u8abf"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "\u5730\u57df\u5354\u8abf" can be positioned, from the perspective of Martin Heidegger's Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve<\/strong>, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Australia's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around \u5730\u57df\u5354\u8abf are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

5. Application to "\u8d8a\u5883\u30c7\u30fc\u30bf"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "\u8d8a\u5883\u30c7\u30fc\u30bf" can be positioned, from the perspective of Martin Heidegger's Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve<\/strong>, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Australia's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around \u8d8a\u5883\u30c7\u30fc\u30bf are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

\"Philosophical<\/p>\n

Implications for Executives and Practitioners<\/h2>\n

The philosophical reflection of this essay is not merely academic. The Martin Heidegger perspective carries three practical implications for executives operating in Australia.<\/p>\n

First, it raises the reflexive question of how the firm's business model connects to the logic of Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve<\/strong>. Second, in dialogue with regulators and civil society, it suggests dimensions of consensus formation that purely technical arguments cannot reach. Third, it indicates that the long-term ground of business legitimacy lies not so much in technical advantage or market share as in participation in such philosophical-normative debates.<\/p>\n

Academic Positioning and Future Research<\/h2>\n

The argument of this essay attempts to graft a philosophical perspective onto the mainstream political-science and legal approaches to internet governance research. Three future research questions follow.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Verification of the applicability of Martin Heidegger's framework to other IGF conferences<\/li>\n
  2. Comparative contrast between Ontology \/ Phenomenology<\/strong> and other theoretical traditions<\/li>\n
  3. Exploration of dialogue possibilities with the indigenous intellectual traditions of Australia<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    In particular, the third point has the potential to liberate IGF research from West-centric debate and open a more multi-layered discursive space.<\/p>\n

    \n

    Primary Sources<\/strong><\/p>\n