{"id":11186,"date":"2024-06-22T23:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-06-22T14:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nkzw.jp\/igf\/2024\/06\/22\/en-philo-switzerland-igf-2024-haraway-cyborg\/"},"modified":"2024-06-22T23:00:00","modified_gmt":"2024-06-22T14:00:00","slug":"en-philo-switzerland-igf-2024-haraway-cyborg","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nkzw.jp\/igf\/2024\/06\/22\/en-philo-switzerland-igf-2024-haraway-cyborg\/","title":{"rendered":"Harawayan Cyborg Manifesto on Switzerland IGF 2024 Geneva \u2014 Cyborg and boundary crossing"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Thumbnail\"<\/p>\n

\n

This essay applies the conceptual framework of the Feminist STS<\/strong> \u2014 most prominently associated with Donna Haraway<\/strong> \u2014 to re-read the Switzerland IGF 2024 Geneva conference. Target audience: researchers, doctoral students, policy analysts, and executives.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Introduction: The Problem<\/h2>\n

Haraway's Cyborg Manifesto offered the political possibility of disrupting binaries \u2014 human\/machine, nature\/culture, male\/female. Switzerland IGF is a venue where these boundaries are constantly negotiated.<\/p>\n

This essay argues that the multistakeholder process of Switzerland IGF becomes intelligible in its specificity only through the concept of Cyborg and boundary crossing<\/strong>, and that the concept itself undergoes transformation under the new material of digital space. Describing this mutual transformation is the task of this essay.<\/p>\n

\"Analytical<\/p>\n

Politics of the human\/machine boundary<\/h2>\n

Discussion of AI\u502b\u7406 in Switzerland is politics of the human\/machine boundary. Haraway's "situated knowledges" suggests that IGF produces situated knowledge even while speaking the universal.<\/p>\n

Each session's agenda-setting can be read as a contemporary restaging of the Donna Haraway-type problematic.<\/p>\n

The national-level IGF (Switzerland IGF) is an attempt to redefine the modern category of the nation-state in the digital era.<\/p>\n

Situated knowledges<\/h2>\n

Donna Haraway's concepts are not confined to abstract philosophical discussion; they apply to the concrete agenda items debated at the 2024 conference. We examine that application below.<\/p>\n

1. Application to "AI\u502b\u7406"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "AI\u502b\u7406" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing<\/strong>, as a central problematic. In Switzerland's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around AI\u502b\u7406 are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

2. Application to "GDC"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "GDC" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing<\/strong>, as a derivative problematic. In Switzerland's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around GDC are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

3. Application to "\u30c7\u30b8\u30bf\u30eb\u5916\u4ea4"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "\u30c7\u30b8\u30bf\u30eb\u5916\u4ea4" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing<\/strong>, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Switzerland's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around \u30c7\u30b8\u30bf\u30eb\u5916\u4ea4 are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

4. Application to "\u56fd\u5185\u6cd5\u6574\u5099"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "\u56fd\u5185\u6cd5\u6574\u5099" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing<\/strong>, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Switzerland's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around \u56fd\u5185\u6cd5\u6574\u5099 are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

5. Application to "\u653f\u5e9c\uff0b\u6c11\u9593\u5354\u50cd"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "\u653f\u5e9c\uff0b\u6c11\u9593\u5354\u50cd" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing<\/strong>, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Switzerland's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around \u653f\u5e9c\uff0b\u6c11\u9593\u5354\u50cd are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

\"Philosophical<\/p>\n

Implications for Executives and Practitioners<\/h2>\n

The philosophical reflection of this essay is not merely academic. The Donna Haraway perspective carries three practical implications for executives operating in Switzerland.<\/p>\n

First, it raises the reflexive question of how the firm's business model connects to the logic of Cyborg and boundary crossing<\/strong>. Second, in dialogue with regulators and civil society, it suggests dimensions of consensus formation that purely technical arguments cannot reach. Third, it indicates that the long-term ground of business legitimacy lies not so much in technical advantage or market share as in participation in such philosophical-normative debates.<\/p>\n

Academic Positioning and Future Research<\/h2>\n

The argument of this essay attempts to graft a philosophical perspective onto the mainstream political-science and legal approaches to internet governance research. Three future research questions follow.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Verification of the applicability of Donna Haraway's framework to other IGF conferences<\/li>\n
  2. Comparative contrast between Feminist STS<\/strong> and other theoretical traditions<\/li>\n
  3. Exploration of dialogue possibilities with the indigenous intellectual traditions of Switzerland<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    In particular, the third point has the potential to liberate IGF research from West-centric debate and open a more multi-layered discursive space.<\/p>\n

    \n

    Primary Sources<\/strong><\/p>\n