{"id":11381,"date":"2018-06-05T14:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-06-05T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nkzw.jp\/igf\/2018\/06\/05\/en-philo-newzealand-igf-2018-buen-vivir\/"},"modified":"2018-06-05T14:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-06-05T05:00:00","slug":"en-philo-newzealand-igf-2018-buen-vivir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nkzw.jp\/igf\/2018\/06\/05\/en-philo-newzealand-igf-2018-buen-vivir\/","title":{"rendered":"Buen Vivir on New Zealand IGF 2018 Wellington \u2014 Sumak Kawsay \/ Suma Qama\u00f1a"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Thumbnail\"<\/p>\n

\n

This essay applies the conceptual framework of the Latin American Indigenous Philosophy<\/strong> \u2014 most prominently associated with Alberto Acosta \/ Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions<\/strong> \u2014 to re-read the New Zealand IGF 2018 Wellington conference. Target audience: researchers, doctoral students, policy analysts, and executives.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Introduction: The Problem<\/h2>\n

Buen Vivir, rooted in Latin American indigenous thought and inscribed in Bolivian-Ecuadorian constitutions, names a concept of "good living." Debates on \u63a5\u7d9a\u6027 at New Zealand IGF can be reinterrogated from this lens.<\/p>\n

This essay argues that the multistakeholder process of New Zealand IGF becomes intelligible in its specificity only through the concept of Sumak Kawsay \/ Suma Qama\u00f1a<\/strong>, and that the concept itself undergoes transformation under the new material of digital space. Describing this mutual transformation is the task of this essay.<\/p>\n

\"Analytical<\/p>\n

Alternative to developmentalism<\/h2>\n

Against New Zealand's development model, Buen Vivir centers harmony with community and nature rather than "more and faster" development. Digital infrastructure investment can be reviewed from this lens.<\/p>\n

Each session's agenda-setting can be read as a contemporary restaging of the Alberto Acosta \/ Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions-type problematic.<\/p>\n

The national-level IGF (New Zealand IGF) is an attempt to redefine the modern category of the nation-state in the digital era.<\/p>\n

Digital good living<\/h2>\n

Alberto Acosta \/ Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions's concepts are not confined to abstract philosophical discussion; they apply to the concrete agenda items debated at the 2018 conference. We examine that application below.<\/p>\n

1. Application to "\u63a5\u7d9a\u6027"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "\u63a5\u7d9a\u6027" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alberto Acosta \/ Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions's Sumak Kawsay \/ Suma Qama\u00f1a<\/strong>, as a central problematic. In New Zealand's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around \u63a5\u7d9a\u6027 are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

2. Application to "AI\u502b\u7406"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "AI\u502b\u7406" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alberto Acosta \/ Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions's Sumak Kawsay \/ Suma Qama\u00f1a<\/strong>, as a derivative problematic. In New Zealand's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around AI\u502b\u7406 are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

3. Application to "\u5148\u4f4f\u6c11\uff08\u30de\u30aa\u30ea\uff09\u30c7\u30b8\u30bf\u30eb\u6a29\u5229"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "\u5148\u4f4f\u6c11\uff08\u30de\u30aa\u30ea\uff09\u30c7\u30b8\u30bf\u30eb\u6a29\u5229" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alberto Acosta \/ Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions's Sumak Kawsay \/ Suma Qama\u00f1a<\/strong>, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In New Zealand's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around \u5148\u4f4f\u6c11\uff08\u30de\u30aa\u30ea\uff09\u30c7\u30b8\u30bf\u30eb\u6a29\u5229 are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

4. Application to "\u56fd\u5185\u6cd5\u6574\u5099"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "\u56fd\u5185\u6cd5\u6574\u5099" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alberto Acosta \/ Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions's Sumak Kawsay \/ Suma Qama\u00f1a<\/strong>, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In New Zealand's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around \u56fd\u5185\u6cd5\u6574\u5099 are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

5. Application to "\u653f\u5e9c\uff0b\u6c11\u9593\u5354\u50cd"<\/h3>\n

Discussion of "\u653f\u5e9c\uff0b\u6c11\u9593\u5354\u50cd" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alberto Acosta \/ Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions's Sumak Kawsay \/ Suma Qama\u00f1a<\/strong>, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In New Zealand's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around \u653f\u5e9c\uff0b\u6c11\u9593\u5354\u50cd are particularly at stake.<\/p>\n

\"Philosophical<\/p>\n

Implications for Executives and Practitioners<\/h2>\n

The philosophical reflection of this essay is not merely academic. The Alberto Acosta \/ Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions perspective carries three practical implications for executives operating in New Zealand.<\/p>\n

First, it raises the reflexive question of how the firm's business model connects to the logic of Sumak Kawsay \/ Suma Qama\u00f1a<\/strong>. Second, in dialogue with regulators and civil society, it suggests dimensions of consensus formation that purely technical arguments cannot reach. Third, it indicates that the long-term ground of business legitimacy lies not so much in technical advantage or market share as in participation in such philosophical-normative debates.<\/p>\n

Academic Positioning and Future Research<\/h2>\n

The argument of this essay attempts to graft a philosophical perspective onto the mainstream political-science and legal approaches to internet governance research. Three future research questions follow.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Verification of the applicability of Alberto Acosta \/ Bolivian-Ecuadorian Constitutions's framework to other IGF conferences<\/li>\n
  2. Comparative contrast between Latin American Indigenous Philosophy<\/strong> and other theoretical traditions<\/li>\n
  3. Exploration of dialogue possibilities with the indigenous intellectual traditions of New Zealand<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    In particular, the third point has the potential to liberate IGF research from West-centric debate and open a more multi-layered discursive space.<\/p>\n

    \n

    Primary Sources<\/strong><\/p>\n