Harawayan Cyborg Manifesto on Global IGF 2016 Guadalajara — Cyborg and boundary crossing

Thumbnail

This essay applies the conceptual framework of the Feminist STS — most prominently associated with Donna Haraway — to re-read the Global IGF 2016 Guadalajara conference. Target audience: researchers, doctoral students, policy analysts, and executives.

Introduction: The Problem

Haraway's Cyborg Manifesto offered the political possibility of disrupting binaries — human/machine, nature/culture, male/female. Global IGF is a venue where these boundaries are constantly negotiated.

This essay argues that the multistakeholder process of Global IGF becomes intelligible in its specificity only through the concept of Cyborg and boundary crossing, and that the concept itself undergoes transformation under the new material of digital space. Describing this mutual transformation is the task of this essay.

Analytical Framework

Politics of the human/machine boundary

Discussion of 包摂 in Mexico is politics of the human/machine boundary. Haraway's "situated knowledges" suggests that IGF produces situated knowledge even while speaking the universal.

The conference theme "Enabling Inclusive and Sustainable Growth" carries implications beyond a mere policy slogan. It can be positioned as a contemporary reformulation, in digital-era vocabulary, of the kinds of questions Donna Haraway problematized.

The form of the Global IGF stands between the principle of national sovereignty and the logic of a global public realm that transcends it.

Situated knowledges

Donna Haraway's concepts are not confined to abstract philosophical discussion; they apply to the concrete agenda items debated at the 2016 conference. We examine that application below.

1. Application to "包摂"

Discussion of "包摂" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a central problematic. In Mexico's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 包摂 are particularly at stake.

2. Application to "経済成長"

Discussion of "経済成長" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a derivative problematic. In Mexico's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 経済成長 are particularly at stake.

3. Application to "人権"

Discussion of "人権" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Mexico's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 人権 are particularly at stake.

4. Application to "サイバーセキュリティ"

Discussion of "サイバーセキュリティ" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Mexico's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around サイバーセキュリティ are particularly at stake.

5. Application to "国連連携"

Discussion of "国連連携" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Mexico's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 国連連携 are particularly at stake.

Philosophical Structure

Implications for Executives and Practitioners

The philosophical reflection of this essay is not merely academic. The Donna Haraway perspective carries three practical implications for executives operating in Mexico.

First, it raises the reflexive question of how the firm's business model connects to the logic of Cyborg and boundary crossing. Second, in dialogue with regulators and civil society, it suggests dimensions of consensus formation that purely technical arguments cannot reach. Third, it indicates that the long-term ground of business legitimacy lies not so much in technical advantage or market share as in participation in such philosophical-normative debates.

Academic Positioning and Future Research

The argument of this essay attempts to graft a philosophical perspective onto the mainstream political-science and legal approaches to internet governance research. Three future research questions follow.

  1. Verification of the applicability of Donna Haraway's framework to other IGF conferences
  2. Comparative contrast between Feminist STS and other theoretical traditions
  3. Exploration of dialogue possibilities with the indigenous intellectual traditions of Mexico

In particular, the third point has the potential to liberate IGF research from West-centric debate and open a more multi-layered discursive space.


Primary Sources

Secondary Sources (Philosophy)

  • Works of Donna Haraway (representative texts of Feminist STS)

*This piece belongs to the academic essays (philosophy series). The author's views do not necessarily represent those of any institutional affiliation. Feedback and critique are welcome.*

更新履歴

第1稿投稿 2026年6月23日 12時07分(記事コンテンツアップ)

— 中澤祐樹