This essay applies the conceptual framework of the Third Generation Frankfurt School — most prominently associated with Axel Honneth — to re-read the Baltic IGF 2019 Vilnius conference. Target audience: researchers, doctoral students, policy analysts, and executives.
Introduction: The Problem
Honneth conceives recognition in three layers — love, law, solidarity — arguing that distortions at each layer produce social pathologies. Discussions at Baltic IGF suggest these layers are transformed under digital mediation.
This essay argues that the multistakeholder process of Baltic IGF becomes intelligible in its specificity only through the concept of Three layers: love, law, solidarity, and that the concept itself undergoes transformation under the new material of digital space. Describing this mutual transformation is the task of this essay.
Threefold recognition in digital space
Discussion of バルト協調 in Lithuania engages recognition at the family-relations (love) layer. Legal recognition appears in cross-border data debates; solidarity recognition in online community debates.
Each session's agenda-setting can be read as a contemporary restaging of the Axel Honneth-type problematic.
The regional IGF (Baltic IGF) holds a philosophically distinct position as the intermediate category mediating global universality and national particularity.
Pathologies of recognition
Axel Honneth's concepts are not confined to abstract philosophical discussion; they apply to the concrete agenda items debated at the 2019 conference. We examine that application below.
1. Application to "バルト協調"
Discussion of "バルト協調" can be positioned, from the perspective of Axel Honneth's Three layers: love, law, solidarity, as a central problematic. In Lithuania's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around バルト協調 are particularly at stake.
2. Application to "サイバー防衛"
Discussion of "サイバー防衛" can be positioned, from the perspective of Axel Honneth's Three layers: love, law, solidarity, as a derivative problematic. In Lithuania's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around サイバー防衛 are particularly at stake.
3. Application to "電子政府"
Discussion of "電子政府" can be positioned, from the perspective of Axel Honneth's Three layers: love, law, solidarity, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Lithuania's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 電子政府 are particularly at stake.
4. Application to "地域協調"
Discussion of "地域協調" can be positioned, from the perspective of Axel Honneth's Three layers: love, law, solidarity, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Lithuania's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 地域協調 are particularly at stake.
5. Application to "越境データ"
Discussion of "越境データ" can be positioned, from the perspective of Axel Honneth's Three layers: love, law, solidarity, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Lithuania's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 越境データ are particularly at stake.
Implications for Executives and Practitioners
The philosophical reflection of this essay is not merely academic. The Axel Honneth perspective carries three practical implications for executives operating in Lithuania.
First, it raises the reflexive question of how the firm's business model connects to the logic of Three layers: love, law, solidarity. Second, in dialogue with regulators and civil society, it suggests dimensions of consensus formation that purely technical arguments cannot reach. Third, it indicates that the long-term ground of business legitimacy lies not so much in technical advantage or market share as in participation in such philosophical-normative debates.
Academic Positioning and Future Research
The argument of this essay attempts to graft a philosophical perspective onto the mainstream political-science and legal approaches to internet governance research. Three future research questions follow.
- Verification of the applicability of Axel Honneth's framework to other IGF conferences
- Comparative contrast between Third Generation Frankfurt School and other theoretical traditions
- Exploration of dialogue possibilities with the indigenous intellectual traditions of Lithuania
In particular, the third point has the potential to liberate IGF research from West-centric debate and open a more multi-layered discursive space.
Primary Sources
- IGF Secretariat. Annual Reports of Baltic IGF.
- Baltic IGF 2019 Vilnius Conference Materials.
- Japan IGF Support Organization. https://japanigf.jp/
- Nakazawa Yuki Blog. https://nkzw.jp/category/igf/
Secondary Sources (Philosophy)
- Works of Axel Honneth (representative texts of Third Generation Frankfurt School)
*This piece belongs to the academic essays (philosophy series). The author's views do not necessarily represent those of any institutional affiliation. Feedback and critique are welcome.*
更新履歴
第1稿投稿 2026年6月11日 19時11分（記事コンテンツアップ）
— 中澤祐樹
