Kuki on Contingency and Iki on Youth IGF India 2022 New Delhi — Philosophy of contingency

Thumbnail

This essay applies the conceptual framework of the Japanese Existential Philosophy — most prominently associated with Shuzo Kuki — to re-read the Youth IGF India 2022 New Delhi conference. Target audience: researchers, doctoral students, policy analysts, and executives.

Introduction: The Problem

Kuki's The Problem of Contingency and The Structure of Iki philosophized contingency against necessity and aesthetic mode against logic. Youth IGF India reveals cultural diversity in how contingency is received.

This essay argues that the multistakeholder process of Youth IGF India becomes intelligible in its specificity only through the concept of Philosophy of contingency, and that the concept itself undergoes transformation under the new material of digital space. Describing this mutual transformation is the task of this essay.

Analytical Framework

Aesthetics of digital contingency

Contingent conversations and unplanned encounters at New Delhi often produce IGF's essential outcomes. The sensibility of iki rooted in India resources aesthetic calibration against risk-management bias.

Each session's agenda-setting can be read as a contemporary restaging of the Shuzo Kuki-type problematic.

The Youth IGF practically raises the philosophical problematic of intergenerational justice.

Ethics of iki

Shuzo Kuki's concepts are not confined to abstract philosophical discussion; they apply to the concrete agenda items debated at the 2022 conference. We examine that application below.

1. Application to "若者参画"

Discussion of "若者参画" can be positioned, from the perspective of Shuzo Kuki's Philosophy of contingency, as a central problematic. In India's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 若者参画 are particularly at stake.

2. Application to "データ保護"

Discussion of "データ保護" can be positioned, from the perspective of Shuzo Kuki's Philosophy of contingency, as a derivative problematic. In India's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around データ保護 are particularly at stake.

3. Application to "SNS"

Discussion of "SNS" can be positioned, from the perspective of Shuzo Kuki's Philosophy of contingency, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In India's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around SNS are particularly at stake.

4. Application to "若者育成"

Discussion of "若者育成" can be positioned, from the perspective of Shuzo Kuki's Philosophy of contingency, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In India's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 若者育成 are particularly at stake.

5. Application to "メンタルヘルス"

Discussion of "メンタルヘルス" can be positioned, from the perspective of Shuzo Kuki's Philosophy of contingency, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In India's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around メンタルヘルス are particularly at stake.

Philosophical Structure

Implications for Executives and Practitioners

The philosophical reflection of this essay is not merely academic. The Shuzo Kuki perspective carries three practical implications for executives operating in India.

First, it raises the reflexive question of how the firm's business model connects to the logic of Philosophy of contingency. Second, in dialogue with regulators and civil society, it suggests dimensions of consensus formation that purely technical arguments cannot reach. Third, it indicates that the long-term ground of business legitimacy lies not so much in technical advantage or market share as in participation in such philosophical-normative debates.

Academic Positioning and Future Research

The argument of this essay attempts to graft a philosophical perspective onto the mainstream political-science and legal approaches to internet governance research. Three future research questions follow.

  1. Verification of the applicability of Shuzo Kuki's framework to other IGF conferences
  2. Comparative contrast between Japanese Existential Philosophy and other theoretical traditions
  3. Exploration of dialogue possibilities with the indigenous intellectual traditions of India

In particular, the third point has the potential to liberate IGF research from West-centric debate and open a more multi-layered discursive space.


Primary Sources

Secondary Sources (Philosophy)

  • Works of Shuzo Kuki (representative texts of Japanese Existential Philosophy)

*This piece belongs to the academic essays (philosophy series). The author's views do not necessarily represent those of any institutional affiliation. Feedback and critique are welcome.*

更新履歴

第1稿投稿 2026年6月6日 20時06分(記事コンテンツアップ)

— 中澤祐樹