Harawayan Cyborg Manifesto on Bosnia IGF 2023 Banja Luka — Cyborg and boundary crossing

Thumbnail

This essay applies the conceptual framework of the Feminist STS — most prominently associated with Donna Haraway — to re-read the Bosnia IGF 2023 Banja Luka conference. Target audience: researchers, doctoral students, policy analysts, and executives.

Introduction: The Problem

Haraway's Cyborg Manifesto offered the political possibility of disrupting binaries — human/machine, nature/culture, male/female. Bosnia IGF is a venue where these boundaries are constantly negotiated.

This essay argues that the multistakeholder process of Bosnia IGF becomes intelligible in its specificity only through the concept of Cyborg and boundary crossing, and that the concept itself undergoes transformation under the new material of digital space. Describing this mutual transformation is the task of this essay.

Analytical Framework

Politics of the human/machine boundary

Discussion of 生成AI in Bosnia and Herzegovina is politics of the human/machine boundary. Haraway's "situated knowledges" suggests that IGF produces situated knowledge even while speaking the universal.

Each session's agenda-setting can be read as a contemporary restaging of the Donna Haraway-type problematic.

The national-level IGF (Bosnia IGF) is an attempt to redefine the modern category of the nation-state in the digital era.

Situated knowledges

Donna Haraway's concepts are not confined to abstract philosophical discussion; they apply to the concrete agenda items debated at the 2023 conference. We examine that application below.

1. Application to "生成AI"

Discussion of "生成AI" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a central problematic. In Bosnia and Herzegovina's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 生成AI are particularly at stake.

2. Application to "AIガバナンス"

Discussion of "AIガバナンス" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a derivative problematic. In Bosnia and Herzegovina's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around AIガバナンス are particularly at stake.

3. Application to "若者"

Discussion of "若者" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Bosnia and Herzegovina's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 若者 are particularly at stake.

4. Application to "国内法整備"

Discussion of "国内法整備" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Bosnia and Herzegovina's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 国内法整備 are particularly at stake.

5. Application to "政府+民間協働"

Discussion of "政府+民間協働" can be positioned, from the perspective of Donna Haraway's Cyborg and boundary crossing, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Bosnia and Herzegovina's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 政府+民間協働 are particularly at stake.

Philosophical Structure

Implications for Executives and Practitioners

The philosophical reflection of this essay is not merely academic. The Donna Haraway perspective carries three practical implications for executives operating in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

First, it raises the reflexive question of how the firm's business model connects to the logic of Cyborg and boundary crossing. Second, in dialogue with regulators and civil society, it suggests dimensions of consensus formation that purely technical arguments cannot reach. Third, it indicates that the long-term ground of business legitimacy lies not so much in technical advantage or market share as in participation in such philosophical-normative debates.

Academic Positioning and Future Research

The argument of this essay attempts to graft a philosophical perspective onto the mainstream political-science and legal approaches to internet governance research. Three future research questions follow.

  1. Verification of the applicability of Donna Haraway's framework to other IGF conferences
  2. Comparative contrast between Feminist STS and other theoretical traditions
  3. Exploration of dialogue possibilities with the indigenous intellectual traditions of Bosnia and Herzegovina

In particular, the third point has the potential to liberate IGF research from West-centric debate and open a more multi-layered discursive space.


Primary Sources

Secondary Sources (Philosophy)

  • Works of Donna Haraway (representative texts of Feminist STS)

*This piece belongs to the academic essays (philosophy series). The author's views do not necessarily represent those of any institutional affiliation. Feedback and critique are welcome.*

更新履歴

第1稿投稿 2026年6月9日 13時35分(記事コンテンツアップ)

— 中澤祐樹