This essay applies the framework of Design Management — most prominently associated with Osterwalder et al. — to analyze the AfIGF 2021 Virtual conference from a management perspective. Target audience: executives, MBA students, management researchers, consultants, and policy analysts.
Executive Summary
The Value Proposition Canvas aligns customer "jobs," "pains," "gains" with corresponding "products," "pain relievers," "gain creators." Stakeholder engagement at AfIGF can also be refined through this lens.
For firms operating in Online and adjacent コロナ後デジタル変革, AI, 格差 domains, this essay maps how to incorporate the conference debate into strategic decision-making through the lens of Customer profile and value map.
Jobs-to-be-done analysis of stakeholders
Each stakeholder at Virtual in 2021 carries "jobs" they want done. Organizations from Online can structure clearer value propositions by linking services to these jobs.
The theoretical framework of Osterwalder et al. provides a lens to read the 2021 debate not as mere "industry trends" but as a precursor of structural change. The fact that this is a regional-level discussion has direct strategic implications for the geographic scope of the target market.
Pains and gains
For practical application, we map the applicability of Customer profile and value map to each topic at the conference.
1. Application to "コロナ後デジタル変革"
The discussion on "コロナ後デジタル変革" can be located, in Osterwalder et al.'s framework, as a primary strategic variable.
Concrete managerial implications include:
- Implications for Online's market: early identification of regulatory trends and preemptive business-model adjustment
- Impact on competitive advantage: monitoring competitors' moves and reviewing one's differentiation strategy
- Investment decisions: allocation of R&D investment and reconfiguration of the portfolio
2. Application to "AI"
The discussion on "AI" can be located, in Osterwalder et al.'s framework, as an important constraint.
Concrete managerial implications include:
- Implications for Online's market: early identification of regulatory trends and preemptive business-model adjustment
- Impact on competitive advantage: monitoring competitors' moves and reviewing one's differentiation strategy
- Investment decisions: allocation of R&D investment and reconfiguration of the portfolio
3. Application to "格差"
The discussion on "格差" can be located, in Osterwalder et al.'s framework, as an auxiliary topic.
Concrete managerial implications include:
- Implications for Online's market: early identification of regulatory trends and preemptive business-model adjustment
- Impact on competitive advantage: monitoring competitors' moves and reviewing one's differentiation strategy
- Investment decisions: allocation of R&D investment and reconfiguration of the portfolio
4. Application to "地域協調"
The discussion on "地域協調" can be located, in Osterwalder et al.'s framework, as an auxiliary topic.
Concrete managerial implications include:
- Implications for Online's market: early identification of regulatory trends and preemptive business-model adjustment
- Impact on competitive advantage: monitoring competitors' moves and reviewing one's differentiation strategy
- Investment decisions: allocation of R&D investment and reconfiguration of the portfolio
5. Application to "越境データ"
The discussion on "越境データ" can be located, in Osterwalder et al.'s framework, as an auxiliary topic.
Concrete managerial implications include:
- Implications for Online's market: early identification of regulatory trends and preemptive business-model adjustment
- Impact on competitive advantage: monitoring competitors' moves and reviewing one's differentiation strategy
- Investment decisions: allocation of R&D investment and reconfiguration of the portfolio
Strategic Actions for Firms Operating in Online
We translate the management analysis above into concrete actions for firms operating in Online.
Short-term (within 6 months)
- Intelligence gathering: closely read the AfIGF 2021 minutes and reports; share with the corporate strategy function
- Stakeholder mapping: identify relevant regulators, industry associations, and civil society organizations
- Risk assessment: quantify potential impacts of the regulatory directions under discussion
Medium-term (1–3 years)
- Capability building: close the capability gaps identified through the Customer profile and value map framework
- Alliance strategy: cultivate relationships with the international IGF community
- Regulatory dialogue: shift from reactive compliance to proactive agenda-setting
Long-term (3–10 years)
- Business model reconstruction: structural transformation informed by Osterwalder et al.'s framework
- Contribution to international standard-setting: sustained participation in venues like AfIGF
- Norm formation from Online: accumulation of soft power through distinctive contributions to international debate
ROI Analysis Perspective
In Osterwalder et al.'s framework, ROI of investment in AfIGF participation is evaluated not as a single-year financial metric but as multi-year option value. This aligns with the "real options" approach to decision-making under uncertainty.
| Dimension | Short-term ROI | Long-term option value |
|---|---|---|
| Direct financial | Limited | Medium–Large |
| Network capital | Medium | Large |
| Brand / legitimacy | Medium | Large |
| Policy intelligence | Large | Medium–Large |
| Talent development | Medium | Large |
Conclusion: A Question to Executives
Reading AfIGF 2021 through the auxiliary line of Osterwalder et al.'s framework, the conference emerges not as a mere international gathering but as a site of contemporary implementation of Customer profile and value map. Executives in Online face a strategic choice: passive observer or active participant.
This essay argues that the latter choice is indispensable for building long-term competitive advantage. Osterwalder et al.'s theoretical insight provides the intellectual foundation for that strategic choice.
Primary Sources
- IGF Secretariat. Annual Reports of AfIGF.
- AfIGF 2021 Virtual Conference Materials.
- Japan IGF Support Organization. https://japanigf.jp/
- Nakazawa Yuki Blog. https://nkzw.jp/category/igf/
Secondary Sources (Management)
- Works of Osterwalder et al. (representative texts of Design Management)
*This piece belongs to the academic essays (management series). Strategic proposals are illustrative applications of general analytical frameworks; specific business judgments require individual due diligence.*
更新履歴
第1稿投稿 2026年6月9日 15時24分（記事コンテンツアップ）
— 中澤祐樹
