This essay applies the conceptual framework of the Ontology / Phenomenology — most prominently associated with Martin Heidegger — to re-read the Korea Youth IGF 2022 Seoul conference. Target audience: researchers, doctoral students, policy analysts, and executives.
Introduction: The Problem
Heidegger's concept of Ge-stell (enframing) in "The Question Concerning Technology" captures how modern technology reveals the world as "standing-reserve." The themes of Korea Youth IGF 2022 directly engage the question of controlling this enframing.
This essay argues that the multistakeholder process of Korea Youth IGF becomes intelligible in its specificity only through the concept of Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve, and that the concept itself undergoes transformation under the new material of digital space. Describing this mutual transformation is the task of this essay.
The internet as enframing
Topics like 若者 risk treating both humans and nature as data standing-reserve. Read Heideggerianly, whether the traditional modes of world-disclosure in South Korea contain a "saving power" that can counter this enframing becomes the central question.
Each session's agenda-setting can be read as a contemporary restaging of the Martin Heidegger-type problematic.
The Youth IGF practically raises the philosophical problematic of intergenerational justice.
The saving power
Martin Heidegger's concepts are not confined to abstract philosophical discussion; they apply to the concrete agenda items debated at the 2022 conference. We examine that application below.
1. Application to "若者"
Discussion of "若者" can be positioned, from the perspective of Martin Heidegger's Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve, as a central problematic. In South Korea's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 若者 are particularly at stake.
2. Application to "メタバース"
Discussion of "メタバース" can be positioned, from the perspective of Martin Heidegger's Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve, as a derivative problematic. In South Korea's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around メタバース are particularly at stake.
3. Application to "AI"
Discussion of "AI" can be positioned, from the perspective of Martin Heidegger's Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In South Korea's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around AI are particularly at stake.
4. Application to "若者育成"
Discussion of "若者育成" can be positioned, from the perspective of Martin Heidegger's Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In South Korea's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 若者育成 are particularly at stake.
5. Application to "メンタルヘルス"
Discussion of "メンタルヘルス" can be positioned, from the perspective of Martin Heidegger's Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In South Korea's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around メンタルヘルス are particularly at stake.
Implications for Executives and Practitioners
The philosophical reflection of this essay is not merely academic. The Martin Heidegger perspective carries three practical implications for executives operating in South Korea.
First, it raises the reflexive question of how the firm's business model connects to the logic of Ge-stell (enframing) and standing-reserve. Second, in dialogue with regulators and civil society, it suggests dimensions of consensus formation that purely technical arguments cannot reach. Third, it indicates that the long-term ground of business legitimacy lies not so much in technical advantage or market share as in participation in such philosophical-normative debates.
Academic Positioning and Future Research
The argument of this essay attempts to graft a philosophical perspective onto the mainstream political-science and legal approaches to internet governance research. Three future research questions follow.
- Verification of the applicability of Martin Heidegger's framework to other IGF conferences
- Comparative contrast between Ontology / Phenomenology and other theoretical traditions
- Exploration of dialogue possibilities with the indigenous intellectual traditions of South Korea
In particular, the third point has the potential to liberate IGF research from West-centric debate and open a more multi-layered discursive space.
Primary Sources
- IGF Secretariat. Annual Reports of Korea Youth IGF.
- Korea Youth IGF 2022 Seoul Conference Materials.
- Japan IGF Support Organization. https://japanigf.jp/
- Nakazawa Yuki Blog. https://nkzw.jp/category/igf/
Secondary Sources (Philosophy)
- Works of Martin Heidegger (representative texts of Ontology / Phenomenology)
*This piece belongs to the academic essays (philosophy series). The author's views do not necessarily represent those of any institutional affiliation. Feedback and critique are welcome.*
更新履歴
第1稿投稿 2026年6月4日 17時59分（記事コンテンツアップ）
— 中澤祐樹
