This essay applies the conceptual framework of the Set-theoretic Ontology — most prominently associated with Alain Badiou — to re-read the SEEDIG 2019 Bucharest conference. Target audience: researchers, doctoral students, policy analysts, and executives.
Introduction: The Problem
For Badiou, an event is the sudden emergence of what was uncounted in the existing situation. When a moment of SEEDIG 2019 becomes an "event," it inaugurates a new truth procedure.
This essay argues that the multistakeholder process of SEEDIG becomes intelligible in its specificity only through the concept of Event and truth procedure, and that the concept itself undergoes transformation under the new material of digital space. Describing this mutual transformation is the task of this essay.
IGF as event
For discussions at Bucharest to transcend mere procedure and be later remembered as "the decisive conference," participants must engage in subjectivation that maintains fidelity to the event. Romania's mode of subjectivation is one form of this fidelity.
Each session's agenda-setting can be read as a contemporary restaging of the Alain Badiou-type problematic.
The regional IGF (SEEDIG) holds a philosophically distinct position as the intermediate category mediating global universality and national particularity.
Fidelity and subjectivation
Alain Badiou's concepts are not confined to abstract philosophical discussion; they apply to the concrete agenda items debated at the 2019 conference. We examine that application below.
1. Application to "サイバーセキュリティ"
Discussion of "サイバーセキュリティ" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alain Badiou's Event and truth procedure, as a central problematic. In Romania's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around サイバーセキュリティ are particularly at stake.
2. Application to "AI"
Discussion of "AI" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alain Badiou's Event and truth procedure, as a derivative problematic. In Romania's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around AI are particularly at stake.
3. Application to "格差"
Discussion of "格差" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alain Badiou's Event and truth procedure, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Romania's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 格差 are particularly at stake.
4. Application to "地域協調"
Discussion of "地域協調" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alain Badiou's Event and truth procedure, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Romania's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 地域協調 are particularly at stake.
5. Application to "越境データ"
Discussion of "越境データ" can be positioned, from the perspective of Alain Badiou's Event and truth procedure, as a peripheral yet important problematic. In Romania's context, the three layers of regulatory design, social implementation, and citizen participation around 越境データ are particularly at stake.
Implications for Executives and Practitioners
The philosophical reflection of this essay is not merely academic. The Alain Badiou perspective carries three practical implications for executives operating in Romania.
First, it raises the reflexive question of how the firm's business model connects to the logic of Event and truth procedure. Second, in dialogue with regulators and civil society, it suggests dimensions of consensus formation that purely technical arguments cannot reach. Third, it indicates that the long-term ground of business legitimacy lies not so much in technical advantage or market share as in participation in such philosophical-normative debates.
Academic Positioning and Future Research
The argument of this essay attempts to graft a philosophical perspective onto the mainstream political-science and legal approaches to internet governance research. Three future research questions follow.
- Verification of the applicability of Alain Badiou's framework to other IGF conferences
- Comparative contrast between Set-theoretic Ontology and other theoretical traditions
- Exploration of dialogue possibilities with the indigenous intellectual traditions of Romania
In particular, the third point has the potential to liberate IGF research from West-centric debate and open a more multi-layered discursive space.
Primary Sources
- IGF Secretariat. Annual Reports of SEEDIG.
- SEEDIG 2019 Bucharest Conference Materials.
- Japan IGF Support Organization. https://japanigf.jp/
- Nakazawa Yuki Blog. https://nkzw.jp/category/igf/
Secondary Sources (Philosophy)
- Works of Alain Badiou (representative texts of Set-theoretic Ontology)
*This piece belongs to the academic essays (philosophy series). The author's views do not necessarily represent those of any institutional affiliation. Feedback and critique are welcome.*
更新履歴
第1稿投稿 2026年5月31日 10時37分（記事コンテンツアップ）
— 中澤祐樹
