Moldova IGF 2024 (MIGF 2024) — 4th Moldova Internet Governance Forum — In-Depth Report: Minutes Digest & 3-Line Summary

Moldova IGF 2024 キシナウ — Thumbnail

The 3-Line Summary

Moldova IGF 2024 キシナウ — 3-line summary

  1. The 4th Moldova IGF (MIGF 2024) met on 29–30 April 2024 at Student Hub ASEM in Chișinău, built around three pillars: digital infrastructure, cybersecurity strategy, and innovation versus regulation.
  2. The government's cybersecurity agency, regulator ANRCETI, leading ISP StarNet, ICANN, RIPE NCC and Access Now shared the stage; day two paired a debate on Internet-freedom legislation with the launch of a Moldovan Youth IGF.
  3. A national IGF putting regulators, industry and rights advocates in one room — and starting to groom its next generation — with the AI-regulation-versus-security balance echoing debates everywhere.

Welcome — this is the Japan IGF Support Organization. This in-depth report on Moldova IGF 2024 (MIGF 2024) — 4th Moldova Internet Governance Forum draws on official outputs, session records and on-site reporting. In a hurry? The three lines above and the diagrams carry the gist.

Conference at a Glance (from official records)

Moldova IGF 2024 キシナウ — Conference at a glance

Item Detail
Official name Moldova IGF 2024 (MIGF 2024) — 4th Moldova Internet Governance Forum
Dates 29–30 April 2024
Venue Student Hub ASEM (ASEM Bloc B, 59 Bănulescu-Bodoni St), Chișinău
Theme Regional governance themes
Languages Romanian, Russian and English
Host Association 'Comunitatea Internet' (National Coordinator: Alexei Marciuc)

(See the source list at the end of this article.)

Discussion Digest — from the Session Records

Moldova IGF 2024 キシナウ — Discussion map

Key exchanges extracted from session records and transcripts.

1. Hardening Digital Infrastructure — Government, ISPs and RIPE NCC at One Table

Sessions: Session 1 on digital infrastructure (29 April, 10:40–12:10)

  • Moderated by ICANN's Mikhail Anisimov, the panel brought together IT and cybersecurity official Alexandru Corețchi, Anatolie Golovco of the Prime Minister's office, StarNet CTO Sergiu Chițan and RIPE NCC's Vahan Hovsepyan [1]
  • Government, a major private ISP and the international technical community debated infrastructure development and resilience side by side — the multistakeholder format in miniature [1]

2. National Cybersecurity Strategy — Where Regulation, Rights and Practice Meet

Sessions: Session 2 on cybersecurity strategy (29 April, 12:30–14:00)

  • Ion Vintila of the cybersecurity agency, Viorel Plopa of the Center for Legal Security and Access Now's Anastasiya Zhyrmont examined cybersecurity from both the national-strategy and rights-advocacy angles [1]
  • Moderated by Sergiu Bozianu of the Privacy Research Association, the session centred on balancing stronger security institutions with privacy and civil liberties [1]

3. Innovation versus Regulation — AI Expertise Meets the Regulator

Sessions: Session 3 on innovation and regulation (29 April, 15:00–16:30)

  • ATIC chair Veaceslav Cunev, ANRCETI director Sergiu Gaibu and Council of Europe AI expert Irina Buzu debated how to balance innovation with regulation [1]
  • Moderated by Realitatea Media's Sergiu Scobioala, the industry-regulator-international triangle took on what regulation should look like in the AI era [1]

4. A Youth IGF Is Born, and Internet Freedom Debated — Day 2's Side Events

Sessions: Side events on Internet freedom and security (30 April, 9:30–12:50) and the launch of the Youth IGF initiative (13:40–15:10)

  • The Internet-freedom side event saw Ihor Rozkladai of Ukraine's CEDEM, Internews Moldova's Oxana Iuteș and Freedom House's Tatiana Puiu tackle the legislative challenge of squaring security with civil liberties [1]
  • It was followed by the launch of a Moldovan Youth IGF initiative, moderated by IT4BA's Sergiu Tutunaru, opening a pathway for younger voices into the governance process [1]

Three-Minute Short Talk — Your Questions Answered

Q. What kind of meeting was it?

A. The fourth edition of Moldova's national IGF: two days of dialogue among government, business, international organisations and civil society, built on three sessions — digital infrastructure, cybersecurity strategy, and innovation versus regulation.

Q. What was new?

A. The birth of a Youth IGF. A day-two side event launched the Moldovan Youth IGF initiative — a national IGF starting to cultivate its next generation, symbolically on the same day as the debate on freedom-versus-security legislation.

Q. Why should I care?

A. Balancing AI regulation with innovation, and security laws with civil liberties, are live questions everywhere; the format — regulator and rights groups at the same table — travels well too.

What Is Moldova IGF? (for first-time readers)

Moldova IGF 2024 キシナウ — About Moldova IGF

Moldova IGF is a National or Regional IGF Initiative (NRI), aligning local internet governance discussion with global IGF principles.

Why It Matters to You

What was discussed here becomes the baseline for national digital policy, platform rules and AI regulation worldwide within a few years. The principles confirmed at the 2024 meeting are the foundation of the "next rules" for the phones, social platforms and AI services you use every day.

Sources & References

  1. Moldova Internet Governance Forum 2024(第4回公式サイト) — Comunitatea Internet協会(MIGF事務局) (accessed 2026-07-11)
  2. Moldova IGF — NRI record — UN IGF Secretariat (accessed 2026-07-11)
  3. Moldova Internet Governance Forum 2025(第5回公式サイト・系列の継続確認) — Comunitatea Internet協会(MIGF事務局) (accessed 2026-07-11)
  4. Moldova IGF 2025: digital dialogue without borders(『第5回国内IGF』の明記により2024年=第4回を裏付け) — Logos Press(モルドバ、英語版) (accessed 2026-07-11)

Quotes are translated or condensed from the records listed above. Bracketed numbers [n] refer to the source list.


Related links

Revision History

Rev. 1 — published 13 June 2024, 13:00 (Article published)

Rev. 2 — updated 17 July 2026, 12:32 (Fully revised into the in-depth edition: added the 3-line summary, minutes digest, short talk, source list and diagrams (all quotes verified against the listed sources))

— 中澤祐樹